This thread is locked.Only browsing is available.
Top Page > Browsing
The difference between OpenMX and SIESTA
Date: 2005/11/20 21:02
Name: Hai-Ping Lan   <hplan@pku.edu.cn>

Dear Colleague:

I am a newie to the numerical orbital method. I just learn about OpenMX and SIESTA methods recently, and want to choose one to carry out my study. So i wanna know about the difference between them.

PS. Does the NEGF method be implented in OpenMX ?


Regards,
Hai-Ping
メンテ
Page: [1]

Re: The difference between OpenMX and SIESTA ( No.1 )
Date: 2005/11/22 22:47
Name: T.Ozaki

Hi,

Both the codes are based on numerical pseudo atomic
basis functions. But, some of functionalities are
different. Also, OpenMX is written in C, while SIESTA
is written in Fortran. As for the details, I think,
you had better read the manuals. A better choice may
depend on your interests.

> PS. Does the NEGF method be implented in OpenMX ?

A version is now under testing within developers.

Best regards,

T.Ozaki
メンテ

Page: [1]