| 
|  Re: Problems with NH MD and multiple continuation runs ( No.1 ) |  |  Date: 2021/08/07 11:32 Name: T. Ozaki  <t-ozaki@issp.u-tokyo.ac.jp>
 
Hi, 
 Thank you very much for your report.
 If a keyword is multiply provided in an input file, the first one is used for the calculation.
 So, there is no effect by the current format of the dat## file.
 However, the format should be corrected since it apparently makes users confused as you mentioned.
 So, I am going to fix the problem in an upcoming patch.
 
 Regards,
 
 TO
 |  |  Re: Problems with NH MD and multiple continuation runs ( No.2 ) |  |  Date: 2021/08/08 03:49 Name: Pavel Ondracka  <pavel.ondracka@email.cz>
 
Thanks for the clarification, good to hear there is no issue. And yes, I believe that if it can be possible to not generate some keywords multiple times than it would definitely make the continuation .dat##, .dat### and so on files much easier to read (right now there gets really a lot of stuff appended eventually, so its tricky to read/understand).
 Besides the NH.* stuff and duplicate MD.Init.Velocity and MD.Init.Velocity.Prev, what also shows a lot are duplicite "Atoms.UnitVectors", "NPT.WV.F0", and "Atoms.Unitvectors.Velocity" keys.
 
 BTW the "NPT.WV.F0" and "Atoms.Unitvectors.Velocity" are not even documented in the manual and always contain just zeros in my dat## files, so if zero is the default maybe those keywords can be omitted completely as an another possible improvement/cleanup?
 |  |  Re: Problems with NH MD and multiple continuation runs ( No.3 ) |  |  Date: 2021/08/08 06:40 Name: T. Ozaki
 
Hi, 
 > Besides the NH.* stuff and duplicate MD.Init.Velocity and MD.Init.Velocity.Prev, what also shows
 > a lot are duplicite "Atoms.UnitVectors", "NPT.WV.F0", and "Atoms.Unitvectors.Velocity" keys.
 
 The duplication will also be corrected in an upcoming patch.
 
 > BTW the "NPT.WV.F0" and "Atoms.Unitvectors.Velocity" are not even documented in the manual
 > and always contain just zeros in my dat## files, so if zero is the default maybe those keywords
 > can be omitted completely as an another possible improvement/cleanup?
 
 They will be used in MD simulations with NPT ensemble which will be released in Ver. 4.0.
 
 Regards,
 
 TO
 |  |