|  Re: magnetic property of zigzag MoS2 nanoribbon ( No.1 ) | 
|  Date: 2015/11/05 01:41 Name: Artem Pulkin
 
It is likely that you did not turn the spinorbit coupling on.
 scf.spinorbit.coupling on
 | 
|  Re: magnetic property of zigzag MoS2 nanoribbon ( No.2 ) | 
|  Date: 2015/11/05 07:53 Name: Will 
 
Here, I am just using scf.SpinPolarization on. Why do I need to use the spinorbit coupling in this case?
 
 | 
|  Re: magnetic property of zigzag MoS2 nanoribbon ( No.3 ) | 
|  Date: 2015/11/05 18:48 Name: Artem Pulkin
 
Why do you expect magnetic moments? Isn't it due to SOC in Mo?
 | 
|  Re: magnetic property of zigzag MoS2 nanoribbon ( No.4 ) | 
|  Date: 2015/11/05 22:54 Name: Will 
 
No. In the reference, the authors also calculated the magnetic moments without considering SOC.
 | 
|  Re: magnetic property of zigzag MoS2 nanoribbon ( No.5 ) | 
|  Date: 2015/11/06 19:24 Name: Artem Pulkin
 
In that paper they do not mention spin-orbit coupling at all. What they do is they compare energies for spin-polarized (with SOC as far as I could see from the band structure) and spin-unpolarized calculations. Please correct me if I am wrong.
 | 
|  Re: magnetic property of zigzag MoS2 nanoribbon ( No.6 ) | 
|  Date: 2015/11/06 21:55 Name: Will 
 
Yes, in the paper, they do not mention the spin-orbit coupling, then how can we imagine that the spin-polarized calculation is with SOC? Also, in Fig. 1 (c), the authors mentioned "Spatial spin distribution (up-down) of 8-ZMoS2NR", if they considered the SOC, can they still use up-down?
 Thanks,
 Will
 | 
|  Re: magnetic property of zigzag MoS2 nanoribbon ( No.7 ) | 
|  Date: 2015/11/07 00:35 Name: Artem Pulkin
 
Regarding your first question, no, I am not going to convince you any more that you should use SOC. If you have a question about the paper please ask the authors.
 Regarding your second question, yes, the magnetic moments (or spins) may point up and down and any other direction. For a scalar-relativistic treatment they point up or down only (usually this means along z axis), in non-relativistic treatment there are no spins at all as far as I know.
 |